All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra30: fix UART2 pinmux table entry
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 11:48:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50EDBB87.1030702@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130109175822.GA25746@badger>

On 01/09/2013 10:58 AM, Allen Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 07:46:03PM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 01/08/2013 06:23 PM, Allen Martin wrote:
>>> UART2_TXD and UART2_RXD mux 0 SFIO entries should be IRDA not UARTB.
>>
>> IRDA is just a needlessly different synonym for UARTB; there shouldn't
>> be any mention of IRDA in the pinmux code anywhere, or any users of the
>> pinmux code.
> 
> Oh suck, I didn't realize we had synonyms in the pinmux tables, that
> seems like a really bad idea.  Unfortunately it looks like this
> particular synonym is widespread.  I see it used in the pinmux
> spreadsheets, the downstream Android kernel source, and gfshell code.

It will disappear from the downstream kernels once they've picked up the
upstream pinctrl driver; I spent a fair bit of time correlating all the
various documentation sources and eliminating duplicate names for the
upstream kernel pinctrl driver.

> The bug I was trying to fix here is that IRDA is referenced in the
> u-boot cardhu pinmux table.

Oh, I didn't notice that the second time round; I'm pretty sure I
pointed it out in the very first review. Maybe that was just of the
U-Boot pinmux driver and not the Cardhu file.

> I guess the fix is to change that to
> UARTB, but it sounds like maybe a larger synonym cleanup is needed
> everywhere, do you know of any others? 

I can't recall for sure; I think there were some. I'd suggest comparing
upstream U-Boot's pinmux driver with the upstream kernel's pinctrl
driver, treating the kernel as canonical now.

> I'm thinking there needs to be some better run time error checking in
> the u-boot pinmux code too.  There are some debug asserts in there
> now, but because I didn't have debug turned on this particular bug
> lead to silent corruption of the pinmux registers which was a PITA to
> track down.  Thoughts on turning those asserts into always on error
> checking code?  Not sure how much it will slow down pinmux programming.

I doubt the speed would be significantly affected, unless an error
triggers and the printf/... actually happens, but you don't really care
about speed then.

      reply	other threads:[~2013-01-09 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-09  1:23 [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra30: fix UART2 pinmux table entry Allen Martin
2013-01-09  3:46 ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-09 17:58   ` Allen Martin
2013-01-09 18:48     ` Stephen Warren [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50EDBB87.1030702@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.