From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5 v2] Rename s5p-time to samsung-time Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 11:26:23 -0800 Message-ID: <50EDC45F.5010105@samsung.com> References: <50885608.1030503@openwide.fr> <201212101359.51974.heiko@sntech.de> <50CCEEE7.4090203@openwide.fr> <6825637.7rn5o5FT8e@flatron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-vb0-f50.google.com ([209.85.212.50]:53920 "EHLO mail-vb0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932451Ab3AIT0c (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2013 14:26:32 -0500 Received: by mail-vb0-f50.google.com with SMTP id ft2so1918089vbb.37 for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 11:26:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6825637.7rn5o5FT8e@flatron> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Tomasz Figa Cc: Romain Naour , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Heiko_St=FC?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?bner?= , Kukjin Kim , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, 'Sylwester Nawrocki' On 01/08/13 13:00, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Hi Romain, [...] >> What's wrong with this part of the patch ? >> I applied this patch today on linux-next tree, branch next-20121214. >> (with some hunk but no error) > > Patches that are supposed to go through Samsung (Kgene's) tree, should be > based on for-next branch of Samsung tree. > > Do you have plans to rebase and resubmit this series again? I plan to > submit some patches for S3C64xx (partly based on my historical work on > this platform) and would be nice to have hrtime support already there, > especially when all left is to just merge it. > Tomasz, thanks. As I said, this looks good to me, but, please re-submit this series against on latest my for-next so that I can pick up in Samsung tree. I couldn't apply due to too many conflicts :-( One more note, please add config option and inclusion by alphabetical order rather than just replacing them. Thanks. - Kukjin