All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 06/11] Btrfs: use percpu counter for dirty metadata count
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:48:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50EEB8AD.9020306@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)

->dirty_metadata_bytes is accessed very frequently, so use percpu counter
instead of the u64 variant to reduce the contention of the lock.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/ctree.h     |  9 ++++----
 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c   | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c |  9 +++-----
 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 201be7d..1dcbbfd 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -191,6 +191,8 @@ static int btrfs_csum_sizes[] = { 4, 0 };
 /* ioprio of readahead is set to idle */
 #define BTRFS_IOPRIO_READA (IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE(IOPRIO_CLASS_IDLE, 0))
 
+#define BTRFS_DIRTY_METADATA_THRESH	(32 * 1024 * 1024)
+
 /*
  * The key defines the order in the tree, and so it also defines (optimal)
  * block layout.
@@ -1439,10 +1441,9 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info {
 
 	u64 total_pinned;
 
-	/* protected by the delalloc lock, used to keep from writing
-	 * metadata until there is a nice batch
-	 */
-	u64 dirty_metadata_bytes;
+	/* used to keep from writing metadata until there is a nice batch */
+	struct percpu_counter dirty_metadata_bytes;
+	s32 dirty_metadata_batch;
 	struct list_head dirty_cowonly_roots;
 
 	struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 9263c6e..adf270e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -946,18 +946,20 @@ static int btree_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
 			    struct writeback_control *wbc)
 {
 	struct extent_io_tree *tree;
+	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info;
+	int ret;
+
 	tree = &BTRFS_I(mapping->host)->io_tree;
 	if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
-		struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(mapping->host)->root;
-		u64 num_dirty;
-		unsigned long thresh = 32 * 1024 * 1024;
 
 		if (wbc->for_kupdate)
 			return 0;
 
+		fs_info = BTRFS_I(mapping->host)->root->fs_info;
 		/* this is a bit racy, but that's ok */
-		num_dirty = root->fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes;
-		if (num_dirty < thresh)
+		ret = percpu_counter_compare(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
+					     BTRFS_DIRTY_METADATA_THRESH);
+		if (ret < 0)
 			return 0;
 	}
 	return btree_write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc);
@@ -1125,24 +1127,16 @@ struct extent_buffer *read_tree_block(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 bytenr,
 void clean_tree_block(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root,
 		      struct extent_buffer *buf)
 {
+	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
+
 	if (btrfs_header_generation(buf) ==
-	    root->fs_info->running_transaction->transid) {
+	    fs_info->running_transaction->transid) {
 		btrfs_assert_tree_locked(buf);
 
 		if (test_and_clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY, &buf->bflags)) {
-			spin_lock(&root->fs_info->delalloc_lock);
-			if (root->fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes >= buf->len)
-				root->fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes -= buf->len;
-			else {
-				spin_unlock(&root->fs_info->delalloc_lock);
-				btrfs_panic(root->fs_info, -EOVERFLOW,
-					  "Can't clear %lu bytes from "
-					  " dirty_mdatadata_bytes (%llu)",
-					  buf->len,
-					  root->fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes);
-			}
-			spin_unlock(&root->fs_info->delalloc_lock);
-
+			__percpu_counter_add(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
+					     -buf->len,
+					     fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
 			/* ugh, clear_extent_buffer_dirty needs to lock the page */
 			btrfs_set_lock_blocking(buf);
 			clear_extent_buffer_dirty(buf);
@@ -2004,10 +1998,18 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
 		goto fail_srcu;
 	}
 
+	ret = percpu_counter_init(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes, 0);
+	if (ret) {
+		err = ret;
+		goto fail_bdi;
+	}
+	fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE *
+					(1 + ilog2(nr_cpu_ids));
+
 	fs_info->btree_inode = new_inode(sb);
 	if (!fs_info->btree_inode) {
 		err = -ENOMEM;
-		goto fail_bdi;
+		goto fail_dirty_metadata_bytes;
 	}
 
 	mapping_set_gfp_mask(fs_info->btree_inode->i_mapping, GFP_NOFS);
@@ -2261,6 +2263,7 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
 	leafsize = btrfs_super_leafsize(disk_super);
 	sectorsize = btrfs_super_sectorsize(disk_super);
 	stripesize = btrfs_super_stripesize(disk_super);
+	fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch = leafsize * (1 + ilog2(nr_cpu_ids));
 
 	/*
 	 * mixed block groups end up with duplicate but slightly offset
@@ -2723,6 +2726,8 @@ fail_iput:
 
 	invalidate_inode_pages2(fs_info->btree_inode->i_mapping);
 	iput(fs_info->btree_inode);
+fail_dirty_metadata_bytes:
+	percpu_counter_destroy(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes);
 fail_bdi:
 	bdi_destroy(&fs_info->bdi);
 fail_srcu:
@@ -3401,6 +3406,7 @@ int close_ctree(struct btrfs_root *root)
 	btrfs_close_devices(fs_info->fs_devices);
 	btrfs_mapping_tree_free(&fs_info->mapping_tree);
 
+	percpu_counter_destroy(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes);
 	bdi_destroy(&fs_info->bdi);
 	cleanup_srcu_struct(&fs_info->subvol_srcu);
 
@@ -3443,11 +3449,10 @@ void btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(struct extent_buffer *buf)
 			(unsigned long long)transid,
 			(u64)atomic64_read(&root->fs_info->generation));
 	was_dirty = set_extent_buffer_dirty(buf);
-	if (!was_dirty) {
-		spin_lock(&root->fs_info->delalloc_lock);
-		root->fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes += buf->len;
-		spin_unlock(&root->fs_info->delalloc_lock);
-	}
+	if (!was_dirty)
+		__percpu_counter_add(&root->fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
+				     buf->len,
+				     root->fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
 }
 
 static void __btrfs_btree_balance_dirty(struct btrfs_root *root,
@@ -3457,8 +3462,7 @@ static void __btrfs_btree_balance_dirty(struct btrfs_root *root,
 	 * looks as though older kernels can get into trouble with
 	 * this code, they end up stuck in balance_dirty_pages forever
 	 */
-	u64 num_dirty;
-	unsigned long thresh = 32 * 1024 * 1024;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC)
 		return;
@@ -3466,9 +3470,9 @@ static void __btrfs_btree_balance_dirty(struct btrfs_root *root,
 	if (flush_delayed)
 		btrfs_balance_delayed_items(root);
 
-	num_dirty = root->fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes;
-
-	if (num_dirty > thresh) {
+	ret = percpu_counter_compare(&root->fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
+				     BTRFS_DIRTY_METADATA_THRESH);
+	if (ret > 0) {
 		balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr(
 				   root->fs_info->btree_inode->i_mapping, 1);
 	}
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 1b319df..2d4bdfd 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -3124,12 +3124,9 @@ static int lock_extent_buffer_for_io(struct extent_buffer *eb,
 		set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITEBACK, &eb->bflags);
 		spin_unlock(&eb->refs_lock);
 		btrfs_set_header_flag(eb, BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_WRITTEN);
-		spin_lock(&fs_info->delalloc_lock);
-		if (fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes >= eb->len)
-			fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes -= eb->len;
-		else
-			WARN_ON(1);
-		spin_unlock(&fs_info->delalloc_lock);
+		__percpu_counter_add(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
+				     -eb->len,
+				     fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
 		ret = 1;
 	} else {
 		spin_unlock(&eb->refs_lock);
-- 
1.7.11.7

                 reply	other threads:[~2013-01-10 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50EEB8AD.9020306@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.