From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: nommu: re-enable use of vexpress without ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:45:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50EEC5DF.1010607@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50EEC039.3010905@codeaurora.org>
On 10/01/13 13:20, Christopher Covington wrote:
> On 01/10/2013 05:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> I'd certainly be happy with
>>
>> * removing the intentional build error for ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM, but leaving
>> it in for !ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM
>> * having mach-virt enabled by default on ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM, and only
>> visible for EXPERT.
>> * making mach-virt compatible with all CPUs starting with ARM7.
>>
>> That would make allnoconfig, allyesconfig and allmodconfig work (besides
>> all the other bugs) on qemu at least, avoid build errors with randconfig
>> and make it hard enough to build a kernel that doesn't run on anything.
>
> If this is going to be the approach, I would like to once again suggest that
> paths, configuration options, and compatibility strings along the lines of
> "mach-genericarmv7", "Generic ARMv7 Machine", and "linux,genericarmv7" be
> considered in place of "mach-virt", "Dummy Virtual Machine" and
> "linux,dummy-virt", respectively.
>
> Virtualization may have been the initial motivation for creating mach-virt,
> but the code is clearly also immediately applicable to other environments such
> as simulation/emulation, and sticking to a name like "Dummy Virtual Machine"
> makes it sound like such usage is erroneous.
mach-virt requires GIC, Architected Timers and PSCI. I'm not prepared to
impose these requirements on all future v7 platforms yet.
When we reach a point where we have a completely DT driven setup,
without any explicit hook, I'll be happy to add new compatibility strings.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-10 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-09 18:15 [PATCH] ARM: nommu: re-enable use of vexpress without ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM Jonathan Austin
2013-01-09 18:30 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-09 18:41 ` Will Deacon
2013-01-09 19:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Jonathan Austin
2013-01-09 18:43 ` [PATCH] " Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-09 18:54 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-09 20:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-09 20:39 ` Rob Herring
2013-01-09 20:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-10 3:51 ` Rob Herring
2013-01-10 10:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-10 13:20 ` Christopher Covington
2013-01-10 13:45 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2013-01-09 21:09 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-09 21:00 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-09 21:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-09 21:37 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-09 22:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50EEC5DF.1010607@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.