All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tun: avoid owner checks on IFF_ATTACH_QUEUE
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 22:08:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50EECB43.8020405@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130110113108.GF13451@redhat.com>

On 01/10/2013 07:31 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> At the moment, we check owner when we enable queue in tun.
> This seems redundant and will break some valid uses
> where fd is passed around: I think TUNSETOWNER is there
> to prevent others from attaching to a persistent device not
> owned by them. Here the fd is already attached,
> enabling/disabling queue is more like read/write.

It also change the number of queues of the tuntap, maybe we should limit
this. Note that if management layer does not call TUNSETOWNER, the check
is just a nop. So if management layer want to limit the behavior, it's
its duty to do this correctly.
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>
> ---
>
> Note: this is unrelated to Stefan's bugfix.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index fbd106e..78e3225 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -1789,10 +1792,8 @@ static int tun_set_queue(struct file *file, struct ifreq *ifr)
>  		tun = tfile->detached;
>  		if (!tun)
>  			ret = -EINVAL;
> -		else if (tun_not_capable(tun))
> -			ret = -EPERM;
>  		else
>  			ret = tun_attach(tun, file);
>  	} else if (ifr->ifr_flags & IFF_DETACH_QUEUE) {
>  		tun = rcu_dereference_protected(tfile->tun,
>  						lockdep_rtnl_is_held());



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-10 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-10 11:31 [PATCH] tun: avoid owner checks on IFF_ATTACH_QUEUE Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-10 11:55 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-01-10 22:38   ` David Miller
2013-01-10 14:08 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2013-01-10 14:19   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-10 14:27     ` Jason Wang
2013-01-10 14:41       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-10 14:47         ` Jason Wang
2013-01-10 15:10           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-10 15:27             ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50EECB43.8020405@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.