From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TtJHx-0000IX-Ve for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:39:28 +0100 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2013 06:23:08 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,444,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="244639295" Received: from lpalcu-linux (HELO [10.237.105.165]) ([10.237.105.165]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2013 06:24:10 -0800 Message-ID: <50EECF09.1040205@intel.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:24:09 +0200 From: Laurentiu Palcu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Ashfield References: <50EC3002.8050209@intel.com> <50EEC93F.9060802@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: update-modules, do we need it anymore? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:39:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/10/2013 04:10 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > I don't have any use for the rest of update-modules, so I don't disagree on > that point. I'd just like to see a form of autoload support be continued if > anything happens to update-modules. But since update-modules isn't > mandatory, I suppose nothing drastic will happen to it regardless, but > having > a modern equivalent would be nice :) > Just to be clear on this. Even if update-modules is removed, modules will still be autoloaded by modutils.sh which is run in rcS.d. Also, /etc/init.d/modutils.sh can be run separately. Thanks, Laurentiu