[U-Boot] [PATCH V4 9/9] COMMON: MMC: Command to support EMMC booting and to

[Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>]

On 01/11/2013 01:46 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Amar,
> 
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Amar <amarendra.xt@samsung.com> wrote:
>> This patch adds commands to open, close and resize boot partitions on EMMC.
>>
>> Changes from V1:
>>         1)Combined the common piece of code between 'open' and 'close'
>>         operations.
>>
>> Changes from V2:
>>         1)Updation of commit message and resubmition of proper patch set.
>>
>> Changes from V3:
>>         No change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amar <amarendra.xt@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  common/cmd_mmc.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/cmd_mmc.c b/common/cmd_mmc.c
>> index 7dacd51..1dabb5b 100644
>> --- a/common/cmd_mmc.c
>> +++ b/common/cmd_mmc.c
>> @@ -248,6 +248,84 @@ static int do_mmcops(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[])
>>                                 curr_device, mmc->part_num);
>>
>>                 return 0;
>> +       } else if ((strcmp(argv[1], "open") == 0) ||
>> +                       (strcmp(argv[1], "close") == 0)) {
> 
> How about putting this block in its own function?
> 
>> +               int dev;
>> +               struct mmc *mmc;
>> +
>> +               if (argc == 2)
>> +                       dev = curr_device;
>> +               else if (argc == 3)
>> +                       dev = simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 10);
>> +               else
>> +                       return CMD_RET_USAGE;
>> +
>> +               mmc = find_mmc_device(dev);
>> +               if (!mmc) {
>> +                       printf("no mmc device at slot %x\n", dev);
>> +                       return 1;
>> +               }
>> +
>> +               if (IS_SD(mmc)) {
>> +                       printf("SD device cannot be opened/closed\n");
>> +                       return 1;
>> +               }
>> +
>> +               if (strcmp(argv[1], "open") == 0) {
>> +                       if (!(mmc_boot_open(mmc))) {
>> +                               printf("EMMC OPEN Success.\n");
>> +                               printf("\t\t\t!!!Notice!!!\n");
>> +                               printf("!You must close EMMC"
>> +                                       " boot Partition after all"
>> +                                       " images are written\n");
> 
> Do you need to split these strings so much? Perhaps when it is in a
> function the indenting will be less?
> 
>> +                               printf("!EMMC boot partition"
>> +                                       " has continuity at"
>> +                                       " image writing time.\n");
>> +                               printf("!So, Do not close boot"
>> +                                       " partition, Before, all"
>> +                                       " images are written.\n");
>> +                               return 0;
>> +                       } else {
>> +                               printf("EMMC OPEN Failed.\n");
>> +                               return 1;
> 
> You could put this above the other block and reduce indenting:
> 
> if (mmc_boot_open(mmc)) {
>                                printf("EMMC OPEN Failed.\n");
>                                return 1;
> }
> ...code continues
> 
>> +                       }
>> +               }
>> +
>> +               if (strcmp(argv[1], "close") == 0) {
>> +                       if (!(mmc_boot_close(mmc))) {
>> +                               printf("EMMC CLOSE Success.\n");
> 
> Shouldn't print a message on success
> 
>> +                               return 0;
>> +                       } else {
>> +                               printf("EMMC CLOSE Failed.\n");
>> +                               return 1;
>> +                       }
>> +               }
>> +       } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "bootpart") == 0) {
>> +               int dev;
>> +               dev = simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 10);
>> +
>> +               u32 bootsize = simple_strtoul(argv[3], NULL, 10);
>> +               u32 rpmbsize = simple_strtoul(argv[4], NULL, 10);
>> +               struct mmc *mmc = find_mmc_device(dev);
>> +               if (!mmc) {
>> +                       printf("no mmc device at slot %x\n", dev);
>> +                       return 1;
>> +               }
>> +
>> +               if (IS_SD(mmc)) {
>> +                       printf("It is not a EMMC device\n");
>> +                       return 1;
>> +               }
>> +
>> +               if (0 == mmc_boot_partition_size_change(mmc,
>> +                                               bootsize, rpmbsize)) {
>> +                       printf("EMMC boot partition Size %d MB\n", bootsize);
>> +                       printf("EMMC RPMB partition Size %d MB\n", rpmbsize);
>> +                       return 0;
>> +               } else {
>> +                       printf("EMMC boot partition Size change Failed.\n");
>> +                       return 1;
>> +               }
>>         }
>>
>>         state = MMC_INVALID;
>> @@ -317,5 +395,9 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
>>         "mmc rescan\n"
>>         "mmc part - lists available partition on current mmc device\n"
>>         "mmc dev [dev] [part] - show or set current mmc device [partition]\n"
>> -       "mmc list - lists available devices");
>> +       "mmc list - lists available devices\n"
>> +       "mmc open <device num> - opens the specified device\n"
>> +       "mmc close <device num> - closes the specified device\n"
>> +       "mmc bootpart <device num> <boot part size MB> <RPMB part size MB>\n"
>> +       " - change sizes of boot and RPMB partions of specified device\n");
>>  #endif
> 
> Also did you see Wolfgang's suggestion that we put the partition stuff
> in the 'part' command (at least that's what I think he said). You
> could have 'part open', 'part close' and maybe 'part resize'?
How about using "mmc bootpart <device_num> <ack> <enable> <access>"
Also i think that we can reduce the code line.

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
> 
> Regards,
> Simon
> 
>> --
>> 1.8.0
>>
>