From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: Priozier for remote port on fibre channel devices Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:42:49 +0100 Message-ID: <50EFD089.9050606@suse.de> References: <50EFBDB0.5010004@suse.de> <50EFC81F.1070209@suse.de> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: device-mapper development List-Id: dm-devel.ids On 01/11/2013 09:18 AM, = Andreas.Bleischwitz@continental-corporation.com wrote: > Thanks for the hint, that will at least work for RHEL6+. For RHEL5 I > will use the scripted version. > > The only downside on that is, that I will have a long line for the > weightedpath regex definition as this has to be for each VPLEX-port. > At least I will have reduced the need to write something on my own ;) > Or write you own udev rules to generate shorter names ... Cheers, Hannes -- = Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imend=F6rffer, HRB 16746 (AG N=FCrnberg)