Re: linux-next: please cleanup the cpuidle tree

[Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>]

On 01/11/2013 01:56 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:22:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 00:11:50 +0100 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/07/2013 11:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>
>>>> All the commits in the cpuidle tree have been included upstream before
>>>> v3.6-rc1.  They were rewritten before being merged upstream and so are
>>>> now causing merge conflicts in linux-next.  Could you please reset the
>>>> head of your tree
>>>> (git://git.linaro.org/people/dlezcano/cpuidle-next.git#cpuidle-next) to
>>>> be somewhere in the tree that yours is merged into (pm or Linus').
>>>
>>> Sure. I believe it is done now.
>>
>> Yep, thanks.
> 
> Unfortunately, you reset your tree to be a version of the pm tree that has
> now been rebased :-(  This is now causing more conflicts in linux-next.
> Maybe you should reset your tree to be the same as one of Linus' -rc
> releases for now.

Ok, done.

Thanks
  -- Daniel


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog