From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Create a iSCSI DomU with disks in another DomU running on the same Dom0
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:57:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F03680.3020800@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130111150655.GB15353@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Hello Konrad,
I've found the problem, blkback is adding granted pages to the bio that
is then passed to the underlying block device. When using a iscsi
target running on another DomU in the same h/w this bios end up in
netback, and then when performing the gnttab copy operation, it
complains because the passed mfn belongs to a different domain.
I've checked this by applying the appended patch to blkback, which
allocates a buffer to pass to the bio instead of using the granted
page. Of course this should not applied, since it implies additional
memcpys.
I think the right way to solve this would be to change netback to
use gnttab_map and memcpy instead of gnttab_copy, but I guess this
will imply a performance degradation (haven't benchmarked it, but I
assume gnttab_copy is used in netback because it is faster than
gnttab_map + memcpy + gnttab_unmap).
---
diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
index 8808028..9740cbb 100644
--- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
+++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
@@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ struct pending_req {
unsigned short operation;
int status;
struct list_head free_list;
+ struct page *grant_pages[BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST];
+ void *bio_pages[BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST];
DECLARE_BITMAP(unmap_seg, BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST);
};
@@ -701,6 +703,7 @@ static void xen_blk_drain_io(struct xen_blkif *blkif)
static void __end_block_io_op(struct pending_req *pending_req, int error)
{
+ int i;
/* An error fails the entire request. */
if ((pending_req->operation == BLKIF_OP_FLUSH_DISKCACHE) &&
(error == -EOPNOTSUPP)) {
@@ -724,6 +727,16 @@ static void __end_block_io_op(struct pending_req *pending_req, int error)
* the proper response on the ring.
*/
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&pending_req->pendcnt)) {
+ for (i = 0; i < pending_req->nr_pages; i++) {
+ BUG_ON(pending_req->bio_pages[i] == NULL);
+ if (pending_req->operation == BLKIF_OP_READ) {
+ void *grant = kmap_atomic(pending_req->grant_pages[i]);
+ memcpy(grant, pending_req->bio_pages[i],
+ PAGE_SIZE);
+ kunmap_atomic(grant);
+ }
+ kfree(pending_req->bio_pages[i]);
+ }
xen_blkbk_unmap(pending_req);
make_response(pending_req->blkif, pending_req->id,
pending_req->operation, pending_req->status);
@@ -846,7 +859,6 @@ static int dispatch_rw_block_io(struct xen_blkif *blkif,
int operation;
struct blk_plug plug;
bool drain = false;
- struct page *pages[BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST];
switch (req->operation) {
case BLKIF_OP_READ:
@@ -889,6 +901,7 @@ static int dispatch_rw_block_io(struct xen_blkif *blkif,
pending_req->operation = req->operation;
pending_req->status = BLKIF_RSP_OKAY;
pending_req->nr_pages = nseg;
+ memset(pending_req->bio_pages, 0, sizeof(pending_req->bio_pages));
for (i = 0; i < nseg; i++) {
seg[i].nsec = req->u.rw.seg[i].last_sect -
@@ -933,7 +946,7 @@ static int dispatch_rw_block_io(struct xen_blkif *blkif,
* the hypercall to unmap the grants - that is all done in
* xen_blkbk_unmap.
*/
- if (xen_blkbk_map(req, pending_req, seg, pages))
+ if (xen_blkbk_map(req, pending_req, seg, pending_req->grant_pages))
goto fail_flush;
/*
@@ -943,9 +956,17 @@ static int dispatch_rw_block_io(struct xen_blkif *blkif,
xen_blkif_get(blkif);
for (i = 0; i < nseg; i++) {
+ void *grant;
+ pending_req->bio_pages[i] = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (req->operation == BLKIF_OP_WRITE) {
+ grant = kmap_atomic(pending_req->grant_pages[i]);
+ memcpy(pending_req->bio_pages[i], grant,
+ PAGE_SIZE);
+ kunmap_atomic(grant);
+ }
while ((bio == NULL) ||
(bio_add_page(bio,
- pages[i],
+ virt_to_page(pending_req->bio_pages[i]),
seg[i].nsec << 9,
seg[i].buf & ~PAGE_MASK) == 0)) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-11 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-21 8:29 Create a iSCSI DomU with disks in another DomU running on the same Dom0 Roger Pau Monné
2012-12-21 14:03 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-12-21 14:47 ` Roger Pau Monné
2012-12-21 17:35 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-02 13:05 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-01-02 21:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-09 19:23 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-01-11 15:06 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-11 15:57 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2013-01-11 18:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-11 19:29 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-01-11 21:09 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-12 12:11 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-01-14 15:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F03680.3020800@citrix.com \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.