Re: [PATCH V2] connman: upgrade to 1.10

[Saul Wold <saul.wold@intel.com>]

On 01/11/2013 07:35 AM, Iorga, Cristian wrote:
> Hello Richard, Saul,
>
> Which versions of connman upgrade patches were used? V2 or V3?
>
I used the V2 version since that what I had available, I wanted to get a 
sanity run it for that and the gcc multilib changes (which also broke 
gcc-runtime).

Sau!

> Also, does the issue will be present with V3 also?
>
The v3 patch should split out the qemu change from the patch and it 
should be 3 patches total.

Sau!

> Regards,
> Cristian
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Richard Purdie
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 5:12 PM
> To: Burton, Ross
> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2] connman: upgrade to 1.10
>
> On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 23:59 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 20:26 +0000, Burton, Ross wrote:
>>> On 10 January 2013 18:42, Cristian Iorga <cristian.iorga@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> 0002-storage.c-If-there-is-no-d_type-support-use-fstatat.patch
>>>>      - adapted to the new version
>>>>
>>>> 0001-timezone.c-If-there-is-no-d_type-support-use-fstatat.patch
>>>>      - patch removed (it is included in the new version)
>>>>
>>>> inet-fix-ip-cleanup-functions.patch: added
>>>>      - fix for ip cleanup functions
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Constantin Musca <constantinx.musca@intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga <cristian.iorga@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Also document the point of connman-conf.
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/qemu.inc
>>>> b/meta/conf/machine/include/qemu.inc
>>>> index 5d59a7f..41fe552 100644
>>>> --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/qemu.inc
>>>> +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/qemu.inc
>>>> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ XSERVER ?= "xserver-xorg \
>>>>
>>>>   MACHINE_FEATURES = "apm alsa pcmcia bluetooth irda usbgadget screen"
>>>>
>>>> +MACHINEOVERRIDES .= ":qemu"
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Please submit this as a separate patch, it's effectively unrelated to connman.
>>
>> Please don't use "qemu", use something like qemuall or allqemu since I
>> have some thoughts about how this might interact with the qemu class,
>> most involving the word "badly" ;-).
>
> Saul included this change in MUT on the autobuilders. I've just lost a load of time wondering why we had an odd world autobuilder failure:
>
> http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org:8010/builders/nightly-world/builds/439/steps/shell_43/logs/stdio
>
> This override patch was why :(.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>