From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: Performance regression,
	please revert commit 441ef916ae6569c88b3d6abaf7fea4d69be49d76
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:42:33 +0100
Message-ID: <50F2E3F9.9080507@t-online.de>
References: <50F287E2.9030709@t-online.de>
	<84c8a8$7ah4gd@orsmga001.jf.intel.com>
	<50F28E07.4080707@t-online.de>
	<84c8a8$7aharo@orsmga001.jf.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mailout02.t-online.de (mailout02.t-online.de [194.25.134.17])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9545CE5F12
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Sun, 13 Jan 2013 08:42:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <84c8a8$7aharo@orsmga001.jf.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On 13.01.2013 11:50, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:35:51 +0100, Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de> wrote:
>> On 13.01.2013 11:23, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:09:38 +0100, Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>> There is a massive performance regression on i915GM hardware,
>>>> opening/closing/redrawing looks as if it is done in slow motion.
>>> gen2/3 benefits from it after applying the bugfix to libdrm.
>>> -Chris
>>>
>> Which bugfix?
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1963391/
>
> commit fdda97007b1dbf95beb16a0e3510fd36c89e8c33
> Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Date:   Fri Jan 11 00:55:12 2013 +0000
>
>      intel: Remove the fence count contributions when clearing relocs
> -Chris
>
Thanks, that indeed helps.

cu,
  Knut