From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com ([209.85.215.47]:56472 "EHLO mail-la0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756087Ab3ANJfH (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2013 04:35:07 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id fh20so3608904lab.34 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 01:35:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50F3D145.7060004@gmail.com> (sfid-20130114_103517_104135_4ED1DDF2) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:35:01 +0100 From: Xose Vazquez Perez MIME-Version: 1.0 To: wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] wireless-regdb updated, please check! References: <50F07C03.3050204@gmail.com> <20130111212659.GH2170@tuxdriver.com> <50F2B912.3060902@gmail.com> <50F2C154.2040807@broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: <50F2C154.2040807@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/13/2013 03:14 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 01/13/2013 02:39 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: >> On 01/11/2013 10:26 PM, John W. Linville wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:54:27PM +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: >>>>>> Did you forget CC:wireless-regdb at lists.infradead.org ? >>>> Well, sorta...but I'm not sure that you can prove that anyone actually >>>> reads that list anyway... :-( >> 40 people: > I would put my money on it that most of those are also keeping taps on > the linux-wireless list. I know I do. If people believe wireless-regdb ml is superfluous, should it be removed ? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1TugRf-0005ny-VP for wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:35:08 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id fr10so3602118lab.3 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 01:35:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xYnfzdNppcIDwN5XqQ7P0f4/rs89o9eMLNXslMq8iyw=; b=M25+PUEp+kEF7Xl6Xq8vFmm2+/IeIqgS12zWd0IL1AdcYkUZo7kATIHLYWtvKeeeA7 pa6RW5rfHaXNQu0g2S93ItNNWLqNrbqj0fk2y6fQEM393OKW+0MO0zTASJ7l31oET3wq 2rPqOsichaYb/uMrk9Jn758pfJcYXL9zmUryp0MCvkb0Yq10fin5Sn8nYxb2o2YM+RGE rCrvYVo0jrHvcxTDbaXvd0RDsZIU44Z7HSeK8bvsYTEZZDpPVgb9MgI193S4WD/V+5M7 Q66cO4vEKom1J7iA6Y0PrRzJm7Qdx6s3ASikCjz3qCA4Ra3ykY4WqCN6rmwrwOGWcWO8 oObg== Message-ID: <50F3D145.7060004@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:35:01 +0100 From: Xose Vazquez Perez MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <50F07C03.3050204@gmail.com> <20130111212659.GH2170@tuxdriver.com> <50F2B912.3060902@gmail.com> <50F2C154.2040807@broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: <50F2C154.2040807@broadcom.com> Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] wireless-regdb updated, please check! List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: wireless-regdb-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: wireless-regdb-bounces+johannes=sipsolutions.net@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless List-ID: On 01/13/2013 03:14 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 01/13/2013 02:39 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: >> On 01/11/2013 10:26 PM, John W. Linville wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:54:27PM +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: >>>>>> Did you forget CC:wireless-regdb at lists.infradead.org ? >>>> Well, sorta...but I'm not sure that you can prove that anyone actually >>>> reads that list anyway... :-( >> 40 people: > I would put my money on it that most of those are also keeping taps on > the linux-wireless list. I know I do. If people believe wireless-regdb ml is superfluous, should it be removed ? _______________________________________________ wireless-regdb mailing list wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb