From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <50F43A25.5080401@siemens.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:02:29 +0100
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <50F05652.4000002@siemens.com> <50F05C26.5000400@siemens.com>
In-Reply-To: <50F05C26.5000400@siemens.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai] [PREVIEW] x86/ipipe queue for 3.5
List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/options/xenomai>,
	<mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai>,
	<mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Xenomai <xenomai@xenomai.org>

On 2013-01-11 19:38, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-01-11 19:13, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> at
>>
>>     git://git.xenomai.org/ipipe-jki for-upstream/3.5
>>
>> I've lined up our current x86 queue for I-pipe core-3.5. We are not yet
>> fully done with testing, I'd specifically like to give x86-32 a final
>> kick, so this is just a heads-up.
> 
> Yep, and -32 is broken. Food for next week.

Fortunately, it turned out to be an issue of my virtual test
environment, not of I-pipe.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux