Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/17] target-i386: add x86_cpu_vendor_words2str()

["Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>]

Am 11.01.2013 03:28, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:10:18AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> Make for() cycle reusable for the next patch
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> 
> Very minor style comment below.
> 
>> ---
>>   v4:
>>    - rename x86cpu_vendor_words2str() to x86_cpu_vendor_words2str()
>>         Suggested-By: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
>>   v3:
>>    -replace e[bcd]x arguments naming with vendor[123]
>>    -fix/swap vendor2 and vendor3 order
>>         Spotted-By: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
>>   v2:
>>    -place x86cpu_vendor_words2str() a bit earlier, before feature
>>     arrays to avoid compile error when vendor property is converted
>>     static property.
>> ---
>>  target-i386/cpu.c |   21 ++++++++++++++-------
>>  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
>> index c4ff761..64cc88f 100644
>> --- a/target-i386/cpu.c
>> +++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
>> @@ -45,6 +45,18 @@
>>  #include "hw/apic_internal.h"
>>  #endif
>>  
>> +static void x86_cpu_vendor_words2str(char *dst, uint32_t vendor1,
>> +                                    uint32_t vendor2, uint32_t vendor3)

Same nit here.

>> +{
>> +    int i;
>> +    for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
>> +        dst[i] = vendor1 >> (8 * i);
>> +        dst[i + 4] = vendor2 >> (8 * i);
>> +        dst[i + 8] = vendor3 >> (8 * i);
>> +    }
>> +    dst[CPUID_VENDOR_SZ] = '\0';
>> +}
>> +
>>  /* feature flags taken from "Intel Processor Identification and the CPUID
>>   * Instruction" and AMD's "CPUID Specification".  In cases of disagreement
>>   * between feature naming conventions, aliases may be added.
>> @@ -1213,15 +1225,10 @@ static char *x86_cpuid_get_vendor(Object *obj, Error **errp)
>>      X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(obj);
>>      CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
>>      char *value;
>> -    int i;
>>  
>>      value = (char *)g_malloc(CPUID_VENDOR_SZ + 1);
>> -    for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
>> -        value[i    ] = env->cpuid_vendor1 >> (8 * i);
>> -        value[i + 4] = env->cpuid_vendor2 >> (8 * i);
>> -        value[i + 8] = env->cpuid_vendor3 >> (8 * i);
>> -    }
>> -    value[CPUID_VENDOR_SZ] = '\0';
>> +    x86_cpu_vendor_words2str(value, env->cpuid_vendor1, env->cpuid_vendor2,
>> +                            env->cpuid_vendor3);
> 
> I would add one extra space, so the argument in the second line are
> aligned with the first argument from the previous line.

I can edit both in myself, but I won't manage to go through the whole
patchset(s) til tomorrow. 1-4 look fine so far.

Andreas

> 
>>      return value;
>>  }
>>  
>> -- 
>> 1.7.1
>>
> 


-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg