From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI: Rework acpi_bus_trim()
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:38:20 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F4A4FC.3070904@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3885603.ydrrB7OEKf@vostro.rjw.lan>
2013/01/15 6:33, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This series of patches changes the way acpi_bus_trim() works so that,
> eventually, it walks the namespace twice detaching (ACPI) drivers from
> device nodes being removed in the first pass and removing the device
> nodes in the second pass.
>
> The first two patches are just cleanups removing unused stuff:
>
> [1/5] Remove the ops field from struct acpi_device (unrelated to the rest).
> [2/5] Drop the second argument of acpi_device_unregister().
>
> The next three patches actually rework acpi_bus_trim() in three steps:
>
> [3/5] Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_trim() (all callers pass 1 in there
> anyway.
> [4/5] Reimplement acpi_bus_trim() using acpi_walk_namespace().
> [3/5] Make acpi_bus_trim() carry out two passes as described above.
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> I'm aware of the fact that this will conflict with the patches that Yinghai
> posted a few days ago, but in my opinion the changes here are prerequisite for
> the Yinghai's patchset.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-15 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-14 21:33 [PATCH 0/5] ACPI: Rework acpi_bus_trim() Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-14 21:37 ` [PATCH 1/5] ACPI: Remove the ops field from struct acpi_device Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-14 21:37 ` [PATCH 2/5] ACPI / scan: Drop the second argument of acpi_device_unregister() Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-14 21:37 ` [PATCH 3/5] ACPI / scan: Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_trim() Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-14 21:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] ACPI / scan: Change the implementation " Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-14 21:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] ACPI / scan: Add second pass to acpi_bus_trim() Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-14 23:13 ` Toshi Kani
2013-01-14 23:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-14 22:21 ` [PATCH 0/5] ACPI: Rework acpi_bus_trim() Yinghai Lu
2013-01-14 23:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-15 0:38 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F4A4FC.3070904@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.