From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <50F55E22.9030308@siemens.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:48:18 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <50F19CE1.5080106@zultron.com> <50F19DE4.4030805@xenomai.org> <50F239E1.40400@zultron.com> <50F2A59D.5050600@xenomai.org> <50F30781.3050302@zultron.com> <50F30DE5.7030007@xenomai.org> <50F3F36A.8050804@siemens.com> <50F45358.1020601@xenomai.org> <50F458E9.7080504@siemens.com> <50F4594C.8090907@xenomai.org> <50F45E87.9030701@siemens.com> <50F46D0E.9000706@xenomai.org> <50F53F0E.7020604@siemens.com> <50F54641.3010802@xenomai.org> <50F546E8.2050606@xenomai.org> <50F549AD.7040508@siemens.com> <50F55D33.3020205@xenomai.org> In-Reply-To: <50F55D33.3020205@xenomai.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] 3.5.7 "I-pipe: could not find timer" (Was: Re: Kernel OOPS during regression tests) List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Philippe Gerum Cc: John Morris , Xenomai On 2013-01-15 14:44, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On 01/15/2013 01:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2013-01-15 13:09, Philippe Gerum wrote: >>> On 01/15/2013 01:06 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>>> On 01/15/2013 12:35 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2013-01-14 21:39, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>>>>> Done, also note that my current work is the for-core-3.5.7 branch, not >>>>>> the for-core-3.5 branch. >>>>> >>>>> Both branches point to the same commit ATM. I suppose you didn't push >>>>> the new for-core-3.5.7 version yet. Once done, I'll rebase my stuff on top. >>>> >>>> >>>> Sorry, pushed. >>>> >>> >>> Please everybody, make sure to eventually resync with my tree, this is >>> becoming a mess when merging your stuff here. TIA, >> >> I'm fetching from you regularly, but your public tree contains no >> changes for 3.5, sorry. >> > > You must mean no change for 3.5.3 since the last stable pipeline release > I pushed out. I'm seeing several breakages when merging the very latest > work, I'm solving this with Gilles. I mean that I have no clue what I should resolve. My branch was based on your core-3.5 branch, the latest publicly available version. I've just rebased it on top of Gilles' 3.5.7 queue - without any conflicts. So what are you talking about? Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux