From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <50F6CCCE.2050801@siemens.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:52:46 +0100
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <50F6C3EE.1020508@siemens.com> <50F6C657.2060503@xenomai.org>
	<50F6C781.2060407@siemens.com>
In-Reply-To: <50F6C781.2060407@siemens.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai] ipipe: fix domain migration helper
List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/options/xenomai>,
	<mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai>,
	<mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
Cc: Xenomai <xenomai@xenomai.org>

On 2013-01-16 16:30, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-01-16 16:25, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> On 01/16/2013 04:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Hi Philippe,
>>>
>>> a first heads-up, maybe you have an idea before I start debugging: That
>>> patch causes troubles when our application shuts down. The main thread
>>> hangs like this, unkillable:
>>>
>>
>> It looks like the LO_WAKEUP_REQ virtual interrupt does not reach the 
>> handler.
> 
> Hmm, lostage queue overflow? We used to carry some detection patch (to
> make the existing detector unconditional), not sure what happened to it.
> Will dig in this direction first.

No queue overflow. And you can immediately trigger it on x86-64 with
latency e.g. I have this now in my VM, but a different bug on real HW is
calling which has higher prio. Will come back to this ASAP.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux