All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
To: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST 0/6] rbd: consolidate osd request setup
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:25:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F77D3D.4080705@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50E6EF5F.9080200@inktank.com>

On 01/04/2013 07:03 AM, Alex Elder wrote:
> This series consolidates and encapsulates the setup of all
> osd requests into a single function which takes variable
> arguments appropriate for the type of request.  The result
> groups together common code idioms and I think makes the
> spots that build these messages a little easier to read.
>
> 					-Alex
>
> [PATCH REPOST 1/6] rbd: don't assign extent info in rbd_do_request()
> [PATCH REPOST 2/6] rbd: don't assign extent info in rbd_req_sync_op()
> [PATCH REPOST 3/6] rbd: initialize off and len in rbd_create_rw_op()
> [PATCH REPOST 4/6] rbd: define generalized osd request op routines
> [PATCH REPOST 5/6] rbd: move call osd op setup into rbd_osd_req_op_create()
> [PATCH REPOST 6/6] rbd: move remaining osd op setup into
> rbd_osd_req_op_create()

I'm not sure about the varargs approach. It makes it easy to
accidentally use the wrong parameters. What do you think about
replacing calls to rbd_osd_req_create_op() with helpers for the various
kinds of requests that just call rbd_osd_req_create_op() themselves, so
that the arguments can be checked at compile time? This will probably
be more of an issue with multi-op osd requests in the future.

Eventually I think all this osd-request-related stuff should go into
libceph, but that's a cleanup for another day.

In any case, the new structure looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-17  4:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-04 15:03 [PATCH REPOST 0/6] rbd: consolidate osd request setup Alex Elder
2013-01-04 15:05 ` [PATCH REPOST 1/6] rbd: don't assign extent info in rbd_do_request() Alex Elder
2013-01-04 15:06 ` [PATCH REPOST 2/6] rbd: don't assign extent info in rbd_req_sync_op() Alex Elder
2013-01-04 15:06 ` [PATCH REPOST 3/6] rbd: initialize off and len in rbd_create_rw_op() Alex Elder
2013-01-04 15:06 ` [PATCH REPOST 4/6] rbd: define generalized osd request op routines Alex Elder
2013-01-04 15:06 ` [PATCH REPOST 5/6] rbd: move call osd op setup into rbd_osd_req_op_create() Alex Elder
2013-01-04 15:07 ` [PATCH REPOST 6/6] rbd: move remaining " Alex Elder
2013-01-17  4:23   ` Josh Durgin
2013-01-17  4:37     ` Alex Elder
2013-01-17 22:25       ` Alex Elder
2013-01-17  4:25 ` Josh Durgin [this message]
2013-01-17 22:19   ` [PATCH REPOST 0/6] rbd: consolidate osd request setup Alex Elder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50F77D3D.4080705@inktank.com \
    --to=josh.durgin@inktank.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=elder@inktank.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.