From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mailout4.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.14]:9316 "EHLO mailout4.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751053Ab3ARJsv (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 04:48:51 -0500 Received: from eucpsbgm1.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.244]) by mailout4.w1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MGT001J0F8PV420@mailout4.w1.samsung.com> for linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:48:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [106.116.147.32] by eusync3.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01(7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPA id <0MGT002NGF9C1J30@eusync3.samsung.com> for linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:48:48 +0000 (GMT) Message-id: <50F91A7F.8010502@samsung.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:48:47 +0100 From: Sylwester Nawrocki MIME-version: 1.0 To: arun.kk@samsung.com Cc: Kamil Debski , SUNIL JOSHI , LMML Subject: Re: Wrong patch applied to media-tree References: <7510586.84171358500177683.JavaMail.weblogic@epv6ml01> In-reply-to: <7510586.84171358500177683.JavaMail.weblogic@epv6ml01> Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Arun, On 01/18/2013 10:09 AM, Arun Kumar K wrote: > Hi Sylwester, > > The patch -- "[media] s5p-mfc: Add device tree support" > which is applied to media-tree staging v3.9 is an older one. > I had sent an updated patch to the mailing list -- > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1692181/ > This is the one which Kamil acked. Sorry for this oversight. Indeed this patch has even 'accepted' state in the patchwork: http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/15333 :/ > With the old patch, a kernel warning will come every time > memory allocation is done due to missing device_initialize() call. > Can this be corrected now? Now when the patch is in Mauro's tree we can only fix it by applying an incremental patch. Can you prepare it and send to LMML ? I would then include it in my second pull request for v3.9. Thanks, Sylwester -- Sylwester Nawrocki Samsung Poland R&D Center