From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
Cc: Giuseppe Lettieri <giuseppe.lettieri@iet.unipi.it>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, v.maffione@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] bypassing pci_dma_read() and pci_dma_write() ?
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:14:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F974CA.8010603@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130118160448.GA76938@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
Il 18/01/2013 17:04, Luigi Rizzo ha scritto:
> Hi,
> with a bunch of e1000 improvements we are at a point where we are
> doing over 1Mpps (short frames) and 7-8Gbit/s (1500 byte frames)
> between two guests, and two things that are high in the "perf top"
> stats are phys_page_find() and related memory copies.
>
> Both are triggered by the pci_dma_read() and pci_dma_write(),
> which on e1000 (and presumably other frontends) are called on
> every single descriptor and every single buffer.
>
> I have then tried to access the guest memory without going every
> time through the page lookup. [...]
>
> This relies on the assumption that the ring (which is contiguous in the
> guest's physical address space) is also contiguous in the host's virtual
> address space. In principle the property could be easily verified once
> the ring is set up.
IIRC, the amount of contiguous memory is written by address_space_map in
the plen parameter.
In your case:
> + s->txring = address_space_map(pci_dma_context(&s->dev)->as,
> + base, &desclen, 0 /* is_write */);
that would be desclen on return from address_space_map.
> And of course, am i missing some important detail ?
Unfortunately yes.
First, host memory mappings could change (though they rarely do on PC).
The result of address_space_map is not guaranteed to be stable. To
avoid problems with this, however, you could use something like
hw/dataplane/hostmem.c and even avoid address_space_map altogether.
Second, that pci_dma_*() could have the addresses translated by an
IOMMU. virtio is documented to have "real" physical memory addresses,
but this does not apply to other devices.
Paolo
> Of course the above could be used conditionally if the required
> conditions hold, and then revert to the pci_dma_*()
> in other cases.
>
> cheers
> luigi
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-18 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-18 16:04 [Qemu-devel] bypassing pci_dma_read() and pci_dma_write() ? Luigi Rizzo
2013-01-18 16:14 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-01-18 16:33 ` Luigi Rizzo
2013-01-18 16:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-19 0:58 ` Luigi Rizzo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F974CA.8010603@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=giuseppe.lettieri@iet.unipi.it \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rizzo@iet.unipi.it \
--cc=v.maffione@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.