From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1762005759782075360==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Denis Kenzior Subject: Re: fix for +CMER parser of AT driver (fixes registration) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 13:05:11 -0600 Message-ID: <50FAEE67.1090206@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130119182830.GT3604@emdete.de> List-Id: To: ofono@ofono.org --===============1762005759782075360== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Michael, >> So far you are the first to report a modem that behaves in this manner w= hen >> it comes to parameter lists. > > yes, because i am probably the first that investigated the problem in dep= th. i > saw alot of complains that the registration state is not reached from many > ofono users. cause for that is exactly the +CMER answer of those modems. > Please understand, I'm not denying there's a problem, just that it is = the first I've heard of it. Please mention these reports on IRC or the = Mailing List to me in the future so we can get them addressed quicker. > as the modem in question is used in many thinkpads and other notebooks i = assume > that the many people can't use ofono out of this reason. Can you actually tell me what this modem is? Maybe I can test it on my end? > > so what do you suggest to support this modem? how would a quirk as you > suggested look like? > The CMER parser was introduced in commit b87619. It was essentially a = straight forward port from the SMS driver and meant to fix the = particular behaviors of the Telit devices. This was early September, = surprising that no one complained in 4 months... The way I suggest to fix it would be to skip probing CMER if a quirk is = enabled for your particular device and simply send the appropriate CMER = command. Prior to September oFono simply used to send 'AT+CMER=3D3,0,0,1' Regards, -Denis --===============1762005759782075360==--