From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <50FB033D.8070707@xenomai.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 21:34:05 +0100
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <50FAFF77.8020803@zultron.com> <50FB0138.2090400@xenomai.org>
	<50FB02E8.1060605@zultron.com>
In-Reply-To: <50FB02E8.1060605@zultron.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai] 32-bit regression tests:  CLOCK_REALTIME wonkiness
List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/options/xenomai>,
	<mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai>,
	<mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=subscribe>
To: John Morris <john@zultron.com>
Cc: Xenomai <xenomai@xenomai.org>

On 01/19/2013 09:32 PM, John Morris wrote:

> 
> 
> On 01/19/2013 02:25 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 01/19/2013 09:17 PM, John Morris wrote:
>>
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> These are the final tests on 32-bit before the initial RedHat packages
>>> can be released for wider testing.
>>>
>>> On this host, a Dell Celeron with ICH5 chipset, the CLOCK_REALTIME
>>> numbers look funny.  All other tests run correctly.
> 
>> Nothing really wrong here, the ToD offset is due to the fact that the
>> realtime clock was changed between the time Xenomai read it to set its
>> own realt-ime clock, and the time clocktest is run, and the drift is due
>> to the tsc frequency adjustments made by Linux after Xenomai is started.
>>
> 
> Woo hoo!  That means it's time to start working on the package repos.
> I'll report back soon.  Thanks for all the help.


It would make sense to wait for Jan's results on monday.


-- 
                                                                Gilles.