All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH RFC] Fix avr32 build using internal toolchain
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:54:04 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FBE8EC.6060602@zacarias.com.ar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHt8ZCOH9FgqzkB2KHJSSBc3k76-07iYNfsQ_rjzQCzOFGLEAg@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/20/2013 08:01 AM, Simon Dawson wrote:

> Yes, I understand that the avr32 toolchain is in a bit of a mess. I'm
> using host gcc version 4.6 without problems; from memory, I think it's
> 4.7 that doesn't work --- I might have misremembered 'though...

With gentoo's 4.6.3 it fails for me in the same way as described at
Atmel's site http://www.atmel.no/buildroot/buildroot-issues.html
(Error: invalid register list)

> Yes, I think we discussed this briefly at the Buildroot Developer Days
> in Barcelona. My understanding is that avr32 is regarded
> semi-officially as an end-of-life architecture. Atmel technical
> support are, for the time being, still dealing with support queries
> for avr32.

Do you know if the UC3 microcontrollers are in the same boat?
If they aren't there may still be some hope for the toolchain (at least
binutils/gcc, not much for uclibc/linux).

> From my own perspective, I'd rather keep the avr32 support in
> Buildroot for now. I don't know how many other people are using the
> architecture --- not that many, I suspect. Would that be a major
> problem?

Testing and fixing is an issue on the toolchain side when there's no
upgrade path possible.
I wouldn't like to stick to old and potentially vulnerable versions of
packages (example: gnutls) because the toolchain is too old to handle
it, it's problematic.
And dragging arch-specific patches isn't fun either.
Maybe we can keep it and start marking broken packages as !BR2_avr32 ?
That may be a rough ride though with all the dependencies.
Regards.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-20 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-17 22:16 [Buildroot] [PATCH RFC] Fix avr32 build using internal toolchain spdawson at gmail.com
2013-01-19 10:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-20 11:01   ` Simon Dawson
2013-01-20 12:54     ` Gustavo Zacarias [this message]
2013-01-20 13:22       ` Simon Dawson
2013-01-20 14:22         ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-01-20 21:24           ` Simon Dawson
2013-01-20 14:21     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-20 21:23       ` Simon Dawson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50FBE8EC.6060602@zacarias.com.ar \
    --to=gustavo@zacarias.com.ar \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.