From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752208Ab3ATNek (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jan 2013 08:34:40 -0500 Received: from h1446028.stratoserver.net ([85.214.92.142]:46956 "EHLO mail.ahsoftware.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751471Ab3ATNei (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jan 2013 08:34:38 -0500 Message-ID: <50FBF25C.4030604@ahsoftware.de> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 14:34:20 +0100 From: Alexander Holler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom St Denis CC: Borislav Petkov , Eric Dumazet , "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" , David Miller , steffen klassert , herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Michal Kubecek , Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash References: <313650836.93071.1358686587647.JavaMail.root@elliptictech.com> In-Reply-To: <313650836.93071.1358686587647.JavaMail.root@elliptictech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am 20.01.2013 13:56, schrieb Tom St Denis: > You should really try running checkpatch.pl over code that's already in the kernel before you call out new contributors on it. > > How is this supposed to not be adversarial when I can't even use the Kernel source itself as a reference? In case of the kernel the chicken and egg problem can be answered without any questions, most source existed before checkpatch.pl (evolved to the current state). Regards, Alexander