From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dimitri Maziuk Subject: Re: Understanding Ceph Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 10:39:43 -0600 Message-ID: <50FC1DCF.8010304@bmrb.wisc.edu> References: <50FAC92C.8030709@bmrb.wisc.edu> <50FAE116.2010504@gmail.com> Reply-To: dmaziuk@bmrb.wisc.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cowfish.bmrb.wisc.edu ([144.92.167.220]:60429 "EHLO mail.bmrb.wisc.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752090Ab3ATQkJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jan 2013 11:40:09 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (71-90-100-249.dhcp.ftbg.wi.charter.com [71.90.100.249]) (Authenticated sender: dmaziuk) by mail.bmrb.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1EFA2C010D for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 10:40:08 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On 1/19/2013 12:16 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > We generally recommend the KVM+librbd route, as it is easier to manage the > dependencies, and is well integrated with libvirt. FWIW this is what > OpenStack and CloudStack normally use. OK, so is there a quick stat document for that configuration? (Oh, and "form" in my other message is supposed to be "from": tyop) Dima