From: Stephan Gatzka <stephan.gatzka@gmail.com>
To: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: [RFC:] struct net_device_ops: Add function pointer to fill device specific ndisc information
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:52:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FC2EE4.3080705@gmail.com> (raw)
I've implemented IPv6 over firewire. Right now I'm facing the problem
that the corresponding RFC3146 requires very firewire specific
information sent during neighborhood discovery.
There was already a discussion on the linux1394 mailing list
(http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=30342089 and
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=50E4A3E5.8080304%40gmail.com&forum_name=linux1394-devel)
During that discussion all participants agreed that it makes no sense to
introduce a dependency between the ndisc code and the firewire net driver.
So the most appealing option seems to be to introduce on more callback
routine either in struct net_device or struct net_device_ops:
int (*ndo_fill_llao)(void *llao);
Because I'm not so familiar with the structure of the whole network
infrastructure in Linux, I need some advice if struct net_device or
struct net_device_ops is the right place.
Maybe it's worth to generalize this and do the same for IPv4/ARP because
right now the ARP packets are mangled in the firewire net driver.
Nevertheless, I've to admit that right now it seems that only IPv6 over
firewire requires such a callback routine.
Regards,
Stephan
next reply other threads:[~2013-01-20 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-20 17:52 Stephan Gatzka [this message]
2013-01-20 18:47 ` [RFC:] struct net_device_ops: Add function pointer to fill device specific ndisc information YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-20 21:23 ` Stephan Gatzka
2013-01-21 2:29 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-21 6:25 ` Stephan Gatzka
2013-01-21 7:39 ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-21 11:50 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-21 19:25 ` Stephan Gatzka
2013-01-21 19:57 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-21 21:16 ` Stephan Gatzka
2013-01-27 14:43 ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-27 17:21 ` Stephan Gatzka
2013-01-27 18:20 ` Stephan Gatzka
2013-01-27 18:25 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-27 19:28 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-27 23:26 ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-21 11:50 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-21 8:09 ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-21 12:04 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-21 13:15 ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-21 6:37 ` Stephan Gatzka
2013-01-21 12:16 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-20 21:22 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2013-01-21 6:17 ` Stephan Gatzka
2013-01-21 8:28 ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-21 12:32 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-21 14:15 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50FC2EE4.3080705@gmail.com \
--to=stephan.gatzka@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.