From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <50FD2FFA.9010002@xenomai.org> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:09:30 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4FF369E5.5040007@xenomai.org> <4FF402AD.3020601@xenomai.org> <4FF415AB.2030503@xenomai.org> <4FF44389.3030209@xenomai.org> <4FF44C52.6050809@xenomai.org> <4FF585C4.1000708@xenomai.org> <50AA3732.5000701@xenomai.org> <50BC705D.2040407@xenomai.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Xenomai and normal linux application - Wait time with select() not reliable List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?SmVucyBLw7ZobGVy?= Cc: Xenomai On 01/21/2013 01:06 PM, Jens K=C3=B6hler wrote: > Hello Gilles, >=20 > I did not understand your latests statement. What do you mean with "If > you expect a task using a Linux semaphore to have bounded latencies, > you misunderstood the way Xenomai works." >=20 > Do you think it should work without problems, without delays, latencies= ? > Do you know if someone has already used linux semaphores in a xenomai t= hread? > What do you recommend to find reason and a solution? Using a Linux semaphore causes a switch to secondary mode, which means potentially unbounded latencies. Please keep the list in CC. --=20 Gilles.