All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/12] qdev: export and use qbus_init
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:01:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FD3C3F.6060001@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358771422-14282-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

Am 21.01.2013 13:30, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> BusState subclasses need to do their own allocation because
> qbus_create_inplace calls object_initialize (which wipes out the
> "free" callback).  This patch separates the initialization of the object
> (object_initialize) from its insertion in the qdev tree (qbus_realize); to
> do so, it moves the remaining bits of qbus_create_inplace to qbus_realize
> and export it as qbus_init.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

I think I left some comments on v1: Would it be possible to leave a
bus_initialize() function (without q ;)) in place that calls
object_initialize() plus the-artist-formerly-known-as-qbus_realize(),
shared between object_new() and object_initialize()? ->free was always
set afterwards. The issue I am trying to contain here is a surge of
*_init functions beyond class_init, instance_init, DeviceClass::init.
Sticking to the QOM naming of having *bus_initialize() and *bus_new()
would address that.

Maybe if we reorder the two patches, dropping the use of g_malloc0() first?

Currently care needs to be taken with the in-place bus initialization
functions to not apply PCI_BUS() etc. on the uninitialized variable.
Having a pci_bus_initialize(void *, ...) -> bus_initialize(void *, ...)
-> object_initialize(void *, ...) call chain would solve that.

Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-21 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-21 12:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/12] qdev: correct reference counting Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-21 12:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/12] qdev: export and use qbus_init Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-21 13:01   ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2013-01-21 12:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 02/12] qdev: use object_new, not g_malloc to create buses Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-21 12:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 03/12] qom: preserve object while unparenting it Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-21 13:03   ` Andreas Färber
2013-01-21 12:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 04/12] qom: document reference counting of link properties Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-21 12:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 05/12] qdev: add reference count to a device for the BusChild Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-21 12:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 06/12] qdev: move deletion of children from finalize to unparent Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-21 12:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 07/12] qdev: move unrealization of devices " Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-21 12:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 08/12] qdev: add reference for the bus while it is referred to by the DeviceState Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-21 12:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 09/12] qdev: inline object_delete into qbus_free/qdev_free Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-21 12:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/12] cpu: do not use object_delete Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50FD3C3F.6060001@suse.de \
    --to=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.