All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Rate Limitation of Router Reachability Probing for possible dead routers (is Re: ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in rt6_probe().)
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 04:28:36 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FD96E4.1020607@linux-ipv6.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50FD8BC6.1030509@linux-ipv6.org>

(2013年01月22日 03:41), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
> (2013年01月22日 03:28), Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> Hello YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明,
>>
>> This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
>>
>> The patch 2152caea7196: "ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in 
>> rt6_probe()." from Jan 17, 2013, leads to the following Smatch 
>> complaint:
>>
>> net/ipv6/route.c:495 rt6_probe()
>> 	 error: we previously assumed 'neigh' could be null (see line 490)
>>
>> net/ipv6/route.c
>>    489	
>>    490		if (!neigh ||
>>                      ^^^^^
>> New test.
>>
>>    491		    time_after(jiffies, neigh->updated + rt->rt6i_idev->cnf.rtr_probe_interval)) {
>>    492			struct in6_addr mcaddr;
>>    493			struct in6_addr *target;
>>    494	
>>    495			neigh->updated = jiffies;
>>                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Old dereference.
>>
>>    496	
>>    497			if (neigh)
>>                             ^^^^^
>> Another new test.
> 
> Oh, right, I'll fix.  Thanks!

Ok, fix is easy, but in fact, we have broken router reachability
probing.

Here rt->n was neighbour entry for (unreachable) router.
The specification says, we SHOUDLD probe such router, but we
should  have some rate limit (once per minute, or so).

We used "rt->n->updated" for this purpose, but now, if NS failed,
we may immediately removes neighbour entry for it.  So,
we might continue sending NS to dead router every 1 second.

Any ideas?

--yoshfuji

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-21 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-21 18:28 ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in rt6_probe() Dan Carpenter
2013-01-21 18:41 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-21 19:28   ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki [this message]
2013-01-21 20:44     ` Rate Limitation of Router Reachability Probing for possible dead routers (is Re: ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in rt6_probe().) David Miller
2013-01-22  3:47       ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-22  5:49         ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50FD96E4.1020607@linux-ipv6.org \
    --to=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.