From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [v3 2/2] ARM: tegra: Skip scu_enable(scu_base) if not Cortex A9 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:49:59 -0700 Message-ID: <50FEDF57.1060204@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1358833924-24535-1-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> <1358833924-24535-2-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> <50FEDC0B.7050604@wwwdotorg.org> <20130122184633.GI2153@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130122184633.GI2153@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Will Deacon Cc: Hiroshi Doyu , Russell King , "arnd@arndb.de" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "santosh.shilimkar@ti.com" , "olof@lixom.net" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 01/22/2013 11:46 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Stephan, > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 06:35:55PM +0000, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 01/21/2013 10:52 PM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: >>> Skip scu_enable(scu_base) if CPU is not Cortex A9 with SCU. >> >> Will, is your for-next/perf branch stable; can I pull it into a branch >> destined for arm-soc? Background below: > > I'm going to send a pull request to Russell tomorrow using my for-rmk/perf > branch, so *that* is stable. You might, however, want to wait for Russell to > push that out because it's also needed for kvm and, as such, will need to > be published anyway. > > Sound ok? I'm assuming rmk's branch will be a stable base, so that sounds great, thanks. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:49:59 -0700 Subject: [v3 2/2] ARM: tegra: Skip scu_enable(scu_base) if not Cortex A9 In-Reply-To: <20130122184633.GI2153@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1358833924-24535-1-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> <1358833924-24535-2-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> <50FEDC0B.7050604@wwwdotorg.org> <20130122184633.GI2153@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <50FEDF57.1060204@wwwdotorg.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 01/22/2013 11:46 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Stephan, > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 06:35:55PM +0000, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 01/21/2013 10:52 PM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: >>> Skip scu_enable(scu_base) if CPU is not Cortex A9 with SCU. >> >> Will, is your for-next/perf branch stable; can I pull it into a branch >> destined for arm-soc? Background below: > > I'm going to send a pull request to Russell tomorrow using my for-rmk/perf > branch, so *that* is stable. You might, however, want to wait for Russell to > push that out because it's also needed for kvm and, as such, will need to > be published anyway. > > Sound ok? I'm assuming rmk's branch will be a stable base, so that sounds great, thanks.