From: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched: simplify the select_task_rq_fair()
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:30:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FF9F92.60202@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358929257.5752.109.camel@marge.simpson.net>
On 01/23/2013 04:20 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 15:10 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>> On 01/23/2013 02:28 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
>>> Abbreviated test run:
>>> Tasks jobs/min jti jobs/min/task real cpu
>>> 640 158044.01 81 246.9438 24.54 577.66 Wed Jan 23 07:14:33 2013
>>> 1280 50434.33 39 39.4018 153.80 5737.57 Wed Jan 23 07:17:07 2013
>>> 2560 47214.07 34 18.4430 328.58 12715.56 Wed Jan 23 07:22:36 2013
>>
>> So still not works... and not going to balance path while waking up will
>> fix it, looks like that's the only choice if no error on balance path
>> could be found...benchmark wins again, I'm feeling bad...
>>
>> I will conclude the info we collected and make a v3 later.
>
> FWIW, I hacked virgin to do full balance if an idle CPU was not found,
> leaving the preference to wake cache affine intact though, turned on
> WAKE_BALANCE in all domains, and it did not collapse. In fact, the high
> load end, where the idle search will frequently be a waste of cycles,
> actually improved a bit. Things that make ya go hmmm.
Oh, does that means the old balance path is good while the new is really
broken, I mean, compared this with the previously results, could we say
that all the collapse was just caused by the change of balance path?
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> Tasks jobs/min jti jobs/min/task real cpu
> 1 436.60 100 436.5994 13.88 3.80 Wed Jan 23 08:49:21 2013
> 1 437.23 100 437.2294 13.86 3.85 Wed Jan 23 08:49:45 2013
> 1 440.41 100 440.4070 13.76 3.76 Wed Jan 23 08:50:08 2013
> 5 2463.41 99 492.6829 12.30 10.90 Wed Jan 23 08:50:22 2013
> 5 2427.88 99 485.5769 12.48 11.90 Wed Jan 23 08:50:37 2013
> 5 2431.78 99 486.3563 12.46 11.74 Wed Jan 23 08:50:51 2013
> 10 4867.47 99 486.7470 12.45 23.30 Wed Jan 23 08:51:05 2013
> 10 4855.77 99 485.5769 12.48 23.35 Wed Jan 23 08:51:18 2013
> 10 4891.04 99 489.1041 12.39 22.71 Wed Jan 23 08:51:31 2013
> 20 9789.98 96 489.4992 12.38 36.18 Wed Jan 23 08:51:44 2013
> 20 9774.19 97 488.7097 12.40 39.58 Wed Jan 23 08:51:56 2013
> 20 9774.19 97 488.7097 12.40 37.99 Wed Jan 23 08:52:09 2013
> 40 19086.61 98 477.1654 12.70 89.56 Wed Jan 23 08:52:22 2013
> 40 19116.72 98 477.9180 12.68 92.69 Wed Jan 23 08:52:35 2013
> 40 19056.60 98 476.4151 12.72 90.19 Wed Jan 23 08:52:48 2013
> 80 37149.43 98 464.3678 13.05 114.19 Wed Jan 23 08:53:01 2013
> 80 37436.29 98 467.9537 12.95 111.54 Wed Jan 23 08:53:14 2013
> 80 37206.45 98 465.0806 13.03 111.49 Wed Jan 23 08:53:27 2013
> 160 69605.17 97 435.0323 13.93 152.35 Wed Jan 23 08:53:41 2013
> 160 69705.25 97 435.6578 13.91 152.05 Wed Jan 23 08:53:55 2013
> 160 69356.22 97 433.4764 13.98 154.56 Wed Jan 23 08:54:09 2013
> 320 112482.60 94 351.5081 17.24 285.52 Wed Jan 23 08:54:27 2013
> 320 112222.22 94 350.6944 17.28 287.80 Wed Jan 23 08:54:44 2013
> 320 109994.33 97 343.7323 17.63 302.40 Wed Jan 23 08:55:02 2013
> 640 152273.26 94 237.9270 25.47 614.95 Wed Jan 23 08:55:27 2013
> 640 153175.36 96 239.3365 25.32 608.48 Wed Jan 23 08:55:53 2013
> 640 152994.08 95 239.0533 25.35 609.33 Wed Jan 23 08:56:18 2013
> 1280 191101.26 95 149.2979 40.59 1218.71 Wed Jan 23 08:56:59 2013
> 1280 191667.90 94 149.7405 40.47 1215.06 Wed Jan 23 08:57:40 2013
> 1280 191289.77 94 149.4451 40.55 1217.35 Wed Jan 23 08:58:20 2013
> 2560 221654.52 94 86.5838 69.99 2392.78 Wed Jan 23 08:59:31 2013
> 2560 221117.45 91 86.3740 70.16 2399.01 Wed Jan 23 09:00:41 2013
> 2560 220394.94 93 86.0918 70.39 2409.10 Wed Jan 23 09:01:52 2013
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-23 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1356588535-23251-1-git-send-email-wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2013-01-09 9:28 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched: simplify the select_task_rq_fair() Michael Wang
2013-01-12 8:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-12 10:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-14 9:21 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-15 3:10 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-15 4:52 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-15 8:26 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-17 5:55 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-20 4:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-21 2:50 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-21 4:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-21 5:07 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-21 6:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-21 7:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-21 7:45 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-21 9:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-21 9:22 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-21 9:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-21 10:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-22 3:43 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-22 8:03 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-22 8:56 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-22 11:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-23 3:01 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-23 5:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-22 14:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-23 2:44 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-23 4:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-23 5:09 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-23 6:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-23 7:10 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-23 8:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-23 8:30 ` Michael Wang [this message]
2013-01-23 8:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-23 9:00 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-23 9:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-23 9:26 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-23 9:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-23 9:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-24 6:01 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-24 6:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-24 7:15 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-24 7:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-24 8:14 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-24 9:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-24 9:26 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-24 10:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-25 2:14 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-24 7:00 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-21 7:34 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-21 8:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-21 8:46 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-21 9:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-15 2:46 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-11 8:15 Michael Wang
2013-01-11 10:13 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2013-01-15 2:20 ` Michael Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50FF9F92.60202@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=bitbucket@online.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.