From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=intel.com (client-ip=192.55.52.120; helo=mga04.intel.com; envelope-from=ed.tanous@intel.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46VRZT3bjNzF4Sj for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 06:10:07 +1000 (AEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Sep 2019 13:10:05 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,492,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="197667250" Received: from hades.jf.intel.com (HELO [10.54.51.78]) ([10.54.51.78]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Sep 2019 13:10:05 -0700 Subject: Re: Rant regarding code review issues To: Emily Shaffer Cc: OpenBMC Maillist References: From: Ed Tanous Message-ID: <50cbafb6-6043-40fa-ef2c-2289906afecd@intel.com> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:10:05 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 20:10:10 -0000 On 9/13/19 1:02 PM, Emily Shaffer wrote: > I'll point out that as I understand it, 80c line limit is an > accessibility issue for tools like braille readers or for users who > need to use a larger font size than you may expect. Neat. I never knew that was a reasoning for 80 character widths. I will probably continue to complain in my own head every time I need to go to a few nested scopes and my line gets wrapped in an inconvenient place, but to a lesser extent than before now that I know there's a good reason for it :) -Ed