From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "open list:ACPI" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
PradeepVineshReddy Kodamati <PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com>,
CL Lin <clin41@lenovo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Only evaluate the Intel _OSC and _PDC on platforms with HWP
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:33:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50fcefb1-e910-435d-be0d-d0f45071d179@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0gMcR1wkOMkd5kHp8BZKdZd-HE9DrxByP9puCK-OUfGPA@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/15/2024 05:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 9:33 PM Mario Limonciello
> <mario.limonciello@amd.com> wrote:
>>
>> The UUID 4077A616-290C-47BE-9EBD-D87058713953 and _PDC methods are
>> only used on Intel platforms with HWP support.
>
> I beg to differ. See arch_acpi_set_proc_cap_bits() definition.
Ah I see; thanks for sharing. I agree with you.
>
>> Attempting to evaluate them and showing messages on hardware without
>> HWP is pointless needlessly noisy.
>>
>> Gate the code on X86_FEATURE_HWP.
>
> Not really.
I guess this really started getting noisy in 6.6 (9527264).
Would you be open to downgrading to debug instead?
>
>> Cc: PradeepVineshReddy (Pradeep Vinesh Reddy) Kodamati <PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com>
>> Suggested-by: CL Lin <clin41@lenovo.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
>> index 7a0dd35d62c9..84848b5e65d6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
>> @@ -597,6 +597,8 @@ static bool __init acpi_early_processor_osc(void)
>>
>> void __init acpi_early_processor_control_setup(void)
>> {
>> + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP))
>> + return;
>> if (acpi_early_processor_osc()) {
>> pr_info("_OSC evaluated successfully for all CPUs\n");
>> } else {
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-18 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-14 19:32 [PATCH] ACPI: Only evaluate the Intel _OSC and _PDC on platforms with HWP Mario Limonciello
2024-06-15 10:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-06-18 19:33 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2024-06-18 19:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50fcefb1-e910-435d-be0d-d0f45071d179@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com \
--cc=clin41@lenovo.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.