From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [143.182.124.37]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB02E002AB for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:11:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Jan 2013 08:11:57 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,523,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="194355827" Received: from unknown (HELO envy.home) ([10.255.15.29]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Jan 2013 08:11:57 -0800 Message-ID: <51000BCC.2060302@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:11:56 -0800 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yocto Project X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Subject: SRC_URI checksums X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:11:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit What is the practice for SRC_URI checksums? I see many recipes with both md5sum and sha256sum. Is there a need to have both? Is one preferred over the other? Thanks, -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Technical Lead - Linux Kernel