From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stephen@networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tuntap: limit the number of flow caches
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:22:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5100A90C.2030406@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130123.135024.1407137924304146015.davem@davemloft.net>
On 01/24/2013 02:50 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:59:13 +0800
>
>> We create new flow caches when a new flow is identified by tuntap, This may lead
>> some issues:
>>
>> - userspace may produce a huge amount of short live flows to exhaust host memory
>> - the unlimited number of flow caches may produce a long list which increase the
>> time in the linear searching
>>
>> Solve this by introducing a limit of total number of flow caches.
>>
>> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> ---
> Applied, but really flow caches are an extremely broken concept especially
> when external entities control the population of such caches.
>
> We removed the routing cache of the ipv4 networking code exactly because
> this kind of crap does not work at all.
>
> Next you're going to have to add a delicately managed garbage
> collection scheme for this tuntap flow cache, and that will be tuned
> endlessly, when the real issue is that fundamentally this does not
> work.
>
> Instead, make the full lookup scale properly and use appropriate data
> structures. It won't be as fast as a simple hash table demux, but
> it'll actually be immune to growth issues and DoS attacks and give
> consistent and repeatable lookup performance regardless of traffic
> patterns.
Ok, I will rework it in 3.9.
Thanks
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-24 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-23 13:59 [PATCH 1/2] tuntap: reduce memory using of queues Jason Wang
2013-01-23 13:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] tuntap: limit the number of flow caches Jason Wang
2013-01-23 18:50 ` David Miller
2013-01-24 3:22 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2013-01-23 15:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] tuntap: reduce memory using of queues Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-23 18:47 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5100A90C.2030406@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.