From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Danny Al-Gaaf Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] two small patches for CEPH wireshark plugin Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:49:05 +0100 Message-ID: <51019E41.9070705@bisect.de> References: <1359048081-17840-1-git-send-email-danny.al-gaaf@bisect.de> Reply-To: Danny Al-Gaaf Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: Received: from wp188.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.195]:41141 "EHLO wp188.webpack.hosteurope.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755539Ab3AXUtI (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:49:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sage Weil Am 24.01.2013 19:31, schrieb Sage Weil: > Hi Danny! [...] > Since you brought up wireshark... > > We would LOVE LOVE LOVE it if this plugin could get upstream into > wireshark. Yes, this would be great. > IIRC, the problem (last time we checked, ages ago) was that > there were strict coding guidelines for that project that weren't > followed. I'm not sure if that is still the case, or even if that is > accurate. > > It would be great if someone on this list who is looking for a way to > contribute could take the lead on trying to make this happen... :-) I'll take a look at it maybe ... if I find some free time for it. What about the patches? Can we apply them to the ceph git tree until we have another solution for the wireshark code? Danny