From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shilimkar Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: make wakeupgen_lock raw Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:21:49 +0530 Message-ID: <51023995.1050703@ti.com> References: <1354891787-24119-1-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com> <20130124182159.GL4424@arwen.pp.htv.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:52895 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751135Ab3AYHu4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2013 02:50:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20130124182159.GL4424@arwen.pp.htv.fi> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: balbi@ti.com, Tony Lindgren Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List On Thursday 24 January 2013 11:52 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 04:49:47PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> From: Thomas Gleixner >> >> When applying RT patch on top of Linux, spinlocks are >> implemented as RT-mutexes, which means they are preemptable. >> >> Current GIC implementation on OMAP is using a spinlock >> to protect against preemption. As it turns out, we need >> to convert that lock into a raw_spinlock so that OMAP's >> interrupt controller works as expected after RT-patch >> is applied. >> >> This patch is simply to decrease the amount of changes >> RT-team needs to carry out of tree. It doesn't cause any >> changes in behavior. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner >> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi > Sorry i missed this patch. Tony can you please pick it up? For the patch, Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:21:49 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] arm: omap: make wakeupgen_lock raw In-Reply-To: <20130124182159.GL4424@arwen.pp.htv.fi> References: <1354891787-24119-1-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com> <20130124182159.GL4424@arwen.pp.htv.fi> Message-ID: <51023995.1050703@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 24 January 2013 11:52 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 04:49:47PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> From: Thomas Gleixner >> >> When applying RT patch on top of Linux, spinlocks are >> implemented as RT-mutexes, which means they are preemptable. >> >> Current GIC implementation on OMAP is using a spinlock >> to protect against preemption. As it turns out, we need >> to convert that lock into a raw_spinlock so that OMAP's >> interrupt controller works as expected after RT-patch >> is applied. >> >> This patch is simply to decrease the amount of changes >> RT-team needs to carry out of tree. It doesn't cause any >> changes in behavior. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner >> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi > Sorry i missed this patch. Tony can you please pick it up? For the patch, Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar