All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] cpuset: fix cpuset_print_task_mems_allowed() vs rename() race
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:08:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51023D61.9000901@huawei.com> (raw)

rename() will change dentry->d_name. The result of this race can
be worse than seeing partially rewritten name, but we might access
a stale pointer because rename() will re-allocate memory to hold
a longer name.

It's safe in the protection of dentry->d_lock.

v2: check NULL dentry before acquiring dentry lock.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
 kernel/cpuset.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index 16be7c9..4f9dfe4 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -2606,8 +2606,16 @@ void cpuset_print_task_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk)
 
 	dentry = task_cs(tsk)->css.cgroup->dentry;
 	spin_lock(&cpuset_buffer_lock);
-	snprintf(cpuset_name, CPUSET_NAME_LEN,
-		 dentry ? (const char *)dentry->d_name.name : "/");
+
+	if (!dentry) {
+		strcpy(cpuset_name, "/");
+	} else {
+		spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
+		strlcpy(cpuset_name, (const char *)dentry->d_name.name,
+			CPUSET_NAME_LEN);
+		spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+	}
+
 	nodelist_scnprintf(cpuset_nodelist, CPUSET_NODELIST_LEN,
 			   tsk->mems_allowed);
 	printk(KERN_INFO "%s cpuset=%s mems_allowed=%s\n",
-- 
1.8.0.2

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] cpuset: fix cpuset_print_task_mems_allowed() vs rename() race
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:08:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51023D61.9000901@huawei.com> (raw)

rename() will change dentry->d_name. The result of this race can
be worse than seeing partially rewritten name, but we might access
a stale pointer because rename() will re-allocate memory to hold
a longer name.

It's safe in the protection of dentry->d_lock.

v2: check NULL dentry before acquiring dentry lock.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
 kernel/cpuset.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index 16be7c9..4f9dfe4 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -2606,8 +2606,16 @@ void cpuset_print_task_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk)
 
 	dentry = task_cs(tsk)->css.cgroup->dentry;
 	spin_lock(&cpuset_buffer_lock);
-	snprintf(cpuset_name, CPUSET_NAME_LEN,
-		 dentry ? (const char *)dentry->d_name.name : "/");
+
+	if (!dentry) {
+		strcpy(cpuset_name, "/");
+	} else {
+		spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
+		strlcpy(cpuset_name, (const char *)dentry->d_name.name,
+			CPUSET_NAME_LEN);
+		spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+	}
+
 	nodelist_scnprintf(cpuset_nodelist, CPUSET_NODELIST_LEN,
 			   tsk->mems_allowed);
 	printk(KERN_INFO "%s cpuset=%s mems_allowed=%s\n",
-- 
1.8.0.2

             reply	other threads:[~2013-01-25  8:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-25  8:08 Li Zefan [this message]
2013-01-25  8:08 ` [PATCH v2] cpuset: fix cpuset_print_task_mems_allowed() vs rename() race Li Zefan
     [not found] ` <51023D61.9000901-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-25 16:51   ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-25 16:51     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51023D61.9000901@huawei.com \
    --to=lizefan-hv44wf8li93qt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=viro-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.