From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module-base.bbclass: Call make instead of oe_runmake in do_make_scripts
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:43:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5106C6ED.2090204@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359269665-1843-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com>
On 01/26/2013 10:54 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> This makes the external module compilation a bit more robust for
> cases where external module recipes may be passing extra params
> to make via EXTRA_OEMAKE, and more that often one needs to pass
s/that/than/ (this honestly through me a bit :-)
> M=$(PWD) when building external modules and if we use EXTRA_OEMAKE
> that would mean that it would appear in do_make_scripts as well
> and since we are only changing the reference kernel src tree here
> it will not run the make scripts in desired directory.
>
> It is also well explained in top makefile in kernel tree around
> line# 1335 in 3.4
>
> |else # KBUILD_EXTMOD
> |
> |###
> |# External module support.
> |# When building external modules the kernel used as basis is considered
> |# read-only, and no consistency checks are made and the make
> |# system is not used on the basis kernel. If updates are required
> |# in the basis kernel ordinary make commands (without M=...) must
> |# be used.
>
> Therefore passing M=... will not do the updates in the basis
> kernel as expected with 'make scripts' so we have to bypass EXTRA_OEMAKE
>
> [Yocto #3787]
>
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Thanks Khem!
--
Darren
> ---
> meta/classes/module-base.bbclass | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/module-base.bbclass b/meta/classes/module-base.bbclass
> index cfee50a..9dbb4b4 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/module-base.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/module-base.bbclass
> @@ -18,6 +18,6 @@ PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_ARCH}"
> #
> do_make_scripts() {
> unset CFLAGS CPPFLAGS CXXFLAGS LDFLAGS
> - oe_runmake CC="${KERNEL_CC}" LD="${KERNEL_LD}" AR="${KERNEL_AR}" \
> + make CC="${KERNEL_CC}" LD="${KERNEL_LD}" AR="${KERNEL_AR}" \
> -C ${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR} scripts
> }
>
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Technical Lead - Linux Kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-28 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-27 6:54 [PATCH] module-base.bbclass: Call make instead of oe_runmake in do_make_scripts Khem Raj
2013-01-28 18:43 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2013-01-28 19:11 ` Khem Raj
2013-01-28 20:03 ` Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5106C6ED.2090204@linux.intel.com \
--to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=raj.khem@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.