From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: m.szyprowski@samsung.com (Marek Szyprowski) Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:31:13 +0100 Subject: [RFC] ARM: dma-mapping: Return 0 if no ->set_dma_mask() In-Reply-To: <20130128.103320.355771370936761237.hdoyu@nvidia.com> References: <20130128.103320.355771370936761237.hdoyu@nvidia.com> Message-ID: <5107B301.2060802@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello, On 1/28/2013 9:33 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > struct dma_map_ops iommu_ops doesn't have ->set_dma_mask, which causes > crash when dma_set_mask() is called from some driver. I think that the issue is a bit different. It looks that iommu_ops lacks the mandatory set_dma_mask callback. arm_dma_set_mask() can be used for it, so please update your patch to add this missing callback. > Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu > --- > arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h > index a58e0f5..95328bf 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h > @@ -32,7 +32,11 @@ static inline void set_dma_ops(struct device *dev, struct dma_map_ops *ops) > > static inline int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask) > { > - return get_dma_ops(dev)->set_dma_mask(dev, mask); > + struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev); > + > + if (ops->set_dma_mask) > + return ops->set_dma_mask(dev, mask); > + return 0; > } > > #ifdef __arch_page_to_dma Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski Samsung Poland R&D Center