From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>,
Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>,
AnilKumar Ch <anilkumar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: tps65910: Fix using wrong dev argument for calling of_regulator_match
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:46:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51081911.9070604@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130129033918.GA6878@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On 01/28/2013 08:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 05:03:29PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 01/23/2013 07:31 PM, Axel Lin wrote:
>>> The dev parameter is the device requesting the data. In this
>>> case it should be &pdev->dev rather than pdev->dev.parent.
>
>>> The dev parameter is used to call devm_kzalloc in
>>> of_get_regulator_init_data(), which means this fixes a memory
>>> leak because the memory is allocated every time probe() is
>>> called, thus it should be freed when this driver is unloaded.
>
>> With this patch as part of next-20130128, I see a crash when
>> booting my system. Reverting this patch solves the problem.
>
> Hrm, there's nothing obviously wrong with the code here - all we do
> with dev is call devm_kzalloc(). Can you decode where the crash is
> actually occurring, that might give a clue as to what's getting
> upset? In the backtrace it's in regulator_register() but that's a
> pretty big function.
It looks like there's a bug in of_regulator_match() that this exposes.
I'll send a patch shortly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-29 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-24 2:27 [PATCH 1/2] regulator: tps65217: Fix using wrong dev argument for calling of_regulator_match Axel Lin
2013-01-24 2:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: tps65910: " Axel Lin
2013-01-24 4:45 ` Laxman Dewangan
2013-01-24 17:02 ` gg
2013-01-29 0:03 ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-29 3:39 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-29 18:46 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-01-24 4:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] regulator: tps65217: " Mark Brown
[not found] ` <CAFRkauDdbYH2jm_TXypjhe0rWyEOpS-JqZ1G4-WZmFKFJngbkw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-01-24 10:00 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-24 11:00 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51081911.9070604@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=anilkumar@ti.com \
--cc=axel.lin@ingics.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=gg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.