Re: [LARTC] They're killing me (the spammers)

[Je Quitibah <discussoes@gmail.com>]

I appreciate you answer, Ed. Thank you. I already use some methods of
spam contention, such RBLs, filters and SPF checks.
But I really wanna know the answer for the question from my first
e-mail. Thank you.


4MBIT INPUT router ->   gw-iface  2mbit OUTPUT ->  MX-server

If HTB (new verb) the interface that communicates with MX, say, 2mbit,
what will occur to the Input queue of gw-router-iface? Will I still
get the link full with 4mbit or will it get lower to 2mbit too, as the
inner interface?

On 6/16/05, Ed W <lists@wildgooses.com> wrote:
> 
> >Yes, last night it was 4Mbps the rate of incoming mails.
> >I was wondering if I apply HTB to the following scheme:
> >
> >
> 
> You might want to investigate other anti-spam techniques...
> 
> For example I find greylisting very effective, and several block lists
> have very low positives for my spam load.  See the mailing list for your
> MTA if you want to know more though.
> 
> If you are clever then I'm sure you can dream up even more clever ways
> to segregate spam senders from real email - in your position I would be
> blocking IP addresses by now...
> 
> Ed
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc