From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Danny Al-Gaaf Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] fix build (ceph.spec) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:30:39 +0100 Message-ID: <510966CF.6070501@bisect.de> References: <1359568845-7634-1-git-send-email-danny.al-gaaf@bisect.de> <92E15B6073484C53B4AE3A0B85F0FC25@inktank.com> Reply-To: Danny Al-Gaaf Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from wp188.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.195]:52748 "EHLO wp188.webpack.hosteurope.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755152Ab3A3San (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:30:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <92E15B6073484C53B4AE3A0B85F0FC25@inktank.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Gregory Farnum Cc: dan.mick@inktank.com, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Sage Weil , Watkins Noah Am 30.01.2013 19:07, schrieb Gregory Farnum: > On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Danny Al-Gaaf wrote: >> This set fixes some issues in the spec file. >> >> I'm not sure what the reason for >> #35e5d74e5c5786bc91df5dc10b5c08c77305df4e was. But I would revert >> it and fix the underlaying issues instead. > > > That is a pretty obtuse commit message, but it was actually because > while rbd-fuse is ready to be in-tree, we don't think it's ready for > people to be using; there are some undocumented gotchas involved with > it and not a lot of testing. :) Hm, but this is git master and not a released ceph version or the next tree. IMO rbd-fuse should be installed in the master branch to be tested. Otherwise it will be build but maybe never tested by others than developers which know it's there. > I'll let others comment on the Java library moves and other packaging > changes. -Greg Only an additional comment: I've moved the libcephfs_jni.* files to %{_libdir} because this is what SUSE already do for e.g. the *.so files in the libjnidispatch package. Danny