From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Mick Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] fix build (ceph.spec) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:08:28 -0800 Message-ID: <5109FC4C.1070407@inktank.com> References: <1359568845-7634-1-git-send-email-danny.al-gaaf@bisect.de> <92E15B6073484C53B4AE3A0B85F0FC25@inktank.com> <510966CF.6070501@bisect.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.220.53]:43067 "EHLO mail-pa0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750983Ab3AaFIc (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:08:32 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id bg4so1516137pad.26 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:08:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sage Weil Cc: Danny Al-Gaaf , Gregory Farnum , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Watkins Noah On 01/30/2013 11:55 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > I think the end goal is to build an rbd-fuse package, just like ceph-fuse. > I'm not sure it matters how mature the tool is before it goes into the > package; as long as it is separate, people can not install it, and the > distros can keep it out of their supported repos as they like. I like that plan a lot better.