From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Mick Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] fix build (ceph.spec) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:10:45 -0800 Message-ID: <5109FCD5.4040303@inktank.com> References: <1359568845-7634-1-git-send-email-danny.al-gaaf@bisect.de> <92E15B6073484C53B4AE3A0B85F0FC25@inktank.com> <510966CF.6070501@bisect.de> <5109FC4C.1070407@inktank.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-da0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]:64264 "EHLO mail-da0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751069Ab3AaFKs (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:10:48 -0500 Received: by mail-da0-f41.google.com with SMTP id e20so1127495dak.28 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:10:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5109FC4C.1070407@inktank.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sage Weil Cc: Danny Al-Gaaf , Gregory Farnum , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Watkins Noah On 01/30/2013 09:08 PM, Dan Mick wrote: > > > On 01/30/2013 11:55 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > >> I think the end goal is to build an rbd-fuse package, just like >> ceph-fuse. >> I'm not sure it matters how mature the tool is before it goes into the >> package; as long as it is separate, people can not install it, and the >> distros can keep it out of their supported repos as they like. > > I like that plan a lot better. and the major reason it wasn't yet done is that there are no manpages, tests, etc., but I wanted this to be available to experimenters.