From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:16:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from nbd.name ([46.4.11.11]:40676 "EHLO nbd.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6823555Ab3AaNQArYxLw (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:16:00 +0100 Message-ID: <510A6DF2.6000509@phrozen.org> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:13:22 +0100 From: John Crispin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.7) Gecko/20120922 Icedove/10.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 09/10] MIPS: ralink: adds rt305x devicetree References: <1359633561-4980-1-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> <1359633561-4980-10-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> <510A6ABB.2090800@openwrt.org> In-Reply-To: <510A6ABB.2090800@openwrt.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 35659 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: john@phrozen.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips Return-Path: > The specific partition mapping definitively belongs to a rt305x-eval.dts > file and not a dtsi you would create. I’ll split this into 2 files > >> +}; >> diff --git a/arch/mips/ralink/rt305x.c b/arch/mips/ralink/rt305x.c >> index 1e24439..f4b2e4d 100644 >> --- a/arch/mips/ralink/rt305x.c >> +++ b/arch/mips/ralink/rt305x.c >> @@ -185,8 +185,8 @@ void __init ralink_clk_init(void) >> >> void __init ralink_of_remap(void) >> { >> - rt_sysc_membase = plat_of_remap_node("ralink,rt305x-sysc"); >> - rt_memc_membase = plat_of_remap_node("ralink,rt305x-memc"); >> + rt_sysc_membase = plat_of_remap_node("ralink,rt3052-sysc"); >> + rt_memc_membase = plat_of_remap_node("ralink,rt3052-memc"); > > Why are you doing this? If you specify multiple compatible properties, > such as: > compatible = "ralink,rt3052-sysc", "ralink,rt305x-sysc" you should be > good in any case no? I folded that fix into the wrong patch :-) using wild cards is discouraged for compatible strings rt3052 was the first silicon with this sysc version. John