From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fFWirr705aDf for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 08:45:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (mail-wg0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 08:45:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id 12so2709229wgh.7 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:45:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <510B7292.60304@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:45:22 +0100 From: Milan Broz MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <510AC2C3.8010907@barfooze.de> In-Reply-To: <510AC2C3.8010907@barfooze.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] [PATCH] fix portability issues encountered while building against musl libc List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: John Spencer Cc: dm-crypt@saout.de On 01/31/2013 08:15 PM, John Spencer wrote: > 2 header inclusions were missing, one for PATH_MAX (limits.h) and one > for FD_ZERO, FD_SET, ... (sys/select.h) > > on glibc, those headers are erroneusly (namespace pollution) pulled in > through other headers, so the author didnt notice. Both patches applied, thanks. BTW which environment (libc) are you using? Milan