From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sekhar Nori Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] davinci: cpuidle - some cleanups Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:24:23 +0530 Message-ID: <510E4FEF.9040506@ti.com> References: <1359726495-8024-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <510C0E4E.3010008@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:59067 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751641Ab3BCLyh (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Feb 2013 06:54:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <510C0E4E.3010008@kernel.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: Daniel Lezcano , Kevin Hilman , patches@linaro.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 2/2/2013 12:19 AM, Len Brown wrote: > On 02/01/2013 08:48 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> This patchset does some cleanup. It could have been folded in a single >> patch but the review would have been less clean than splitting it into >> small and trivial patches. >> >> The main purpose of this patch is to remove the usage of the driver_data >> field from the state_usage structure. Len Brown is doing this cleanup in >> the intel_idle.c file. With this patchset, the processor_idle.c file will >> be the last user of this field. > > Daniel, > Thanks for this cleanup. > Hopefully we can hear from somebody with davinci HW who can test it? Can someone forward the patches to davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com? I can help verify. Thanks, Sekhar