From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2UD7-0002TK-Di for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 23:08:34 +0100 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2013 13:52:31 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,602,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="286498491" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.12.90]) ([10.255.12.90]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2013 13:52:30 -0800 Message-ID: <51102D9E.1000305@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:52:30 -0800 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Iorga, Cristian" , Lei Yang References: <1359731346-16190-1-git-send-email-cristian.iorga@intel.com> <258C02DC-9331-432A-93B2-4173DA69968D@gmail.com> <969F26A8BAB325438E7EB80D3C3134FB161F3065@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <969F26A8BAB325438E7EB80D3C3134FB161F3065@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] net-tools: upgrade to v1.60-24.2 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:08:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/04/2013 01:10 AM, Iorga, Cristian wrote: > See my answers below. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lei Yang [mailto:yanglei.fage@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 4:15 AM > To: Iorga, Cristian > Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] net-tools: upgrade to v1.60-24.2 > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2013-2-1, at 23:09, Cristian Iorga wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga >> --- >> .../net-tools-config.h | 0 >> .../net-tools-config.make | 0 >> .../net-tools/{net-tools_1.60-23.bb => net-tools_1.60-24.2.bb} | 6 +++--- >> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) rename >> meta/recipes-extended/net-tools/{net-tools-1.60-23 => >> net-tools-1.60-24.2}/net-tools-config.h (100%) rename >> meta/recipes-extended/net-tools/{net-tools-1.60-23 => >> net-tools-1.60-24.2}/net-tools-config.make (100%) rename >> meta/recipes-extended/net-tools/{net-tools_1.60-23.bb => >> net-tools_1.60-24.2.bb} (94%) >> >> diff --git >> a/meta/recipes-extended/net-tools/net-tools-1.60-23/net-tools-config.h >> b/meta/recipes-extended/net-tools/net-tools-1.60-24.2/net-tools-config >> .h >> similarity index 100% >> rename from >> meta/recipes-extended/net-tools/net-tools-1.60-23/net-tools-config.h >> rename to >> meta/recipes-extended/net-tools/net-tools-1.60-24.2/net-tools-config.h >> diff --git >> a/meta/recipes-extended/net-tools/net-tools-1.60-23/net-tools-config.m >> ake >> b/meta/recipes-extended/net-tools/net-tools-1.60-24.2/net-tools-config >> .make >> similarity index 100% >> rename from >> meta/recipes-extended/net-tools/net-tools-1.60-23/net-tools-config.mak >> e rename to >> meta/recipes-extended/net-tools/net-tools-1.60-24.2/net-tools-config.m >> ake diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/net-tools/net-tools_1.60-23.bb >> b/meta/recipes-extended/net-tools/net-tools_1.60-24.2.bb >> similarity index 94% >> rename from meta/recipes-extended/net-tools/net-tools_1.60-23.bb >> rename to meta/recipes-extended/net-tools/net-tools_1.60-24.2.bb >> index bc61d21..4040e1a 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/net-tools/net-tools_1.60-23.bb >> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/net-tools/net-tools_1.60-24.2.bb >> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ BUGTRACKER = "http://bugs.debian.org/net-tools" >> LICENSE = "GPLv2+" >> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=8ca43cbc842c2336e835926c2166c28b \ >> file://ifconfig.c;beginline=11;endline=15;md5=d1ca372080ad5401e23ca0afc35cf9ba" >> -PR = "r3" >> +PR = "r0" >> > > Is there a reason to change it back to r0 > Yes, because an upgrade has been done. > > > Lei > >> SRC_URI = "${DEBIAN_MIRROR}/main/n/net-tools/net-tools_1.60.orig.tar.gz;name=tarball \ >> >> ${DEBIAN_MIRROR}/main/n/net-tools/${BPN}_${PV}.diff.gz;apply=no;name=p >> atch \ > > Not sure why it not apply but not remove it. > Sorry, I don't understand your comment. > This package is distributed as a "base" tarball + patches to higher versions. > Hence, I don't understand your comment. > Cristian: A couple of questions that further need answering: It seems that 1.60-24.2 is a testing/unstable version. Although it also seems that whezzy and Sid are running with this version. Lei: If you look at the full recipe, you will see that net-tools has it's own do_patch to deal with the downloaded version diff patch, therefore not applying during normal patching is correct. In this case as Cristian points out, the .diff.gz is the "update" Sau! > > Lei > >> @@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/net-tools-1.60" >> SRC_URI[tarball.md5sum] = "ecaf37acb5b5daff4bdda77785fd916d" >> SRC_URI[tarball.sha256sum] = "ec67967cf7b1a3a3828a84762fbc013ac50ee5dc9aa3095d5c591f302c2de0f5" >> >> -SRC_URI[patch.md5sum] = "2412e55c20308d5fbd28bfadd18c075f" >> -SRC_URI[patch.sha256sum] = "d678b3ea97d6c7ca548918994642bfc6b5511ab02f3a5881dfcca00c88bfd73b" >> +SRC_URI[patch.md5sum] = "524658bb8df5ff92c4a991f5edcaf240" >> +SRC_URI[patch.sha256sum] = "170cc024fcb34329f4c25fd88b5f160a06be5d6d3eaf0bc976650fd1b1a6235d" >> >> inherit gettext >> >> -- >> 1.7.10.4 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > >